Cryptography is Everywhere

Historically, cryptography was used for secret communication by exclusive sectors only — such as governments, military and spies — since it was crucial and affordable to them. They have long been aware of the consequences of their messages falling into the wrong hands; therefore, this situation has motivated the development of techniques for disguising a message so that only the intended recipient can read it. 

The huge desire for secrecy led nations, kings, and queens to make all-out efforts to ensure the security of communications by inventing the best possible secret codes and ciphers. 

A lover in Victorian times

As the public also became aware of the need to protect personal messages of a highly sensitive nature, they also became comfortable with encipherment. They began to express their cryptographic skills in a variety of ways — for example, young lovers in Victorian England were often forbidden from publicly expressing their affection, and could not even communicate by letter in case their parents intercepted and read the contents. This resulted in lovers sending encrypted messages to each other via the personal columns of newspapers, more specifically, via the classified ads. 

Do You Want to Be a Cryptographer?

Alan Turing

I've always been interested in information security since 2003, but it wasn't until I enrolled on the cryptography module — while studying for a Master in Advanced Computer Science in England in 2018— that I started getting more keen on the mathematical side of cryptography; perhaps it was in part because I cherish mathematics and had the right cryptography teacher. What's more, I admire Alan Turing since he strove to do good work in difficult conditions during World War II; his work saved millions of lives. All of these things together inspired me to immerse myself in the world of cryptography. 

Installing a stand-alone SQL Server 2017 instance step by step

Undoubtedly, many of us have the task of installing a new stand-alone SQL Server instance which includes the database engine service only. For instance, it can primarily be needed for dedicated and consolidated OLTP environments. Consequently, we can be asked to create a formal document for others so that they can easily follow it for future installations and standard configurations.

Today's post is going to outline the process of installing a basic stand-alone SQL Server 2017 instance. This process is just a basic guideline and, surely, not a rule for each installation, because it is fully understood that every environment is different and needs a customised installation to meet very specific requirements. You can read the whole tip about it at mssqltips here https://www.mssqltips.com/sqlservertip/5616/steps-to-install-a-standalone-sql-server-2017-instance. I hope you find it very useful and practical. That's all for now. Please let me know any remarks you may have. Stay tuned!

Configuring Read-Only Routing and load-balancing across Read-Only replicas

With the arrival of AlwaysOn Availability Group in SQL Server 2012, implementing HA+DR solutions have been an easier and not expensive task in comparison to legacy architectures such as Database Mirroring for HA and Log Shipping for DR, and FCI for HA and Database Mirroring for DR. Nevertheless, at the beginning not everyone has been fully aware of all the power of this technology so that some might not have made the most out of it. Naturally, this technology has been improved over the years, for instance, load-balancing across readable secondary replicas was added, and today in this post, I am coming with a script to configure it.

Quickly Checking for Stale Statistics in SQL Server

Monitoring the state of database statistics is crucial because they significantly influence overall performance. When statistics become outdated, performance degradation is inevitable, often leading to slow and inefficient systems—something nobody wants. This raises several important questions:

• How often have you faced unforeseen performance issues, even after completing your regular database maintenance tasks?
• Have you wondered why tasks like index rebuilding and statistics updates are sometimes insufficient?
• If everything was running smoothly before, why has performance suddenly declined?
• Why are indexes not being utilised as expected? Should more indexes be created?

The answer to many of these questions often lies in stale statistics. It's essential to remember that statistics contain vital information that the SQL Optimiser uses to generate optimal execution plans for queries. If these statistics are outdated, the impact on performance can be severe. Simply having the right indexes isn’t enough if the statistics are stale.

Avoid changing default ANSI database options

Not having another way of fixing some specific errors, at times some people may consider turning off any ANSI database options as a final solution. To be perfectly honest, I do recommend getting to the bottom of each problem and then fixing it at that level instead of changing default ANSI settings (unless it is just a quick fix or is truly necessary because you verified the benefits are significant). For instance, it is by no means uncommon to turn ANSI_WARRINGS off to fix the following error:

Msg 8152, Level 16, State 14, Line 5
String or binary data would be truncated.

How to make uniform all the collations of table columns for all databases

Clearly, it is of paramount importance to standardise the collations for all databases in a SQL Server instance in order to avoid dealing with unforeseen conflicts of page code compatibility. We may find ourselves in complicated situations because databases with different collations were migrated from other environments and the new consolidated environment was not prepared to host those new databases, but in one way or another we may need to consolidate them in only one server. It may be compounded by the fact that there may be many character columns of a database using different collations and another collation at database level. What’s more, the tempdb database may be using another different collation.  So, it may turn out to be not only a complex issue but also time-consuming.
To give you just an example, we can start finding out what character columns are using different collations from SQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CI_AS that we need to change in order to make everything uniform. I am going to display a useful script to do it. In this example I am assuming that we want to use SQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CI_AS for all objects in the database server.

EXEC sp_MSforeachdb '
USE [?]
select db_name(),c.name
from sys.columns c
inner join sys.types t on t.user_type_id= c.user_type_id
inner join sys.tables tb on  c.object_id=tb.object_id
where c.collation_name is not null 
and t.is_user_defined=0 and tb.is_ms_shipped=0 and tb.name<>''sysdiagrams''
and c.collation_name<>''SQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CI_AS''
order by tb.name, c.column_id'

After that,we can make the decision of changing all character columns for all databases and use SQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CI_AS, and then make that change at database level. Be cautious and make sure as well you have tempdb’s collation set SQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CI_AS.

EXEC sp_MSforeachdb '
USE [?]
if db_name() not in (''master'',''tempdb'',''msdb'',''model'')
begin
    select replace( REPLACE( ''ALTER TABLE '' + QUOTENAME(SCHEMA_NAME(tb.schema_id)) + ''.'' 
    + QUOTENAME(tb.name) + '' ALTER COLUMN '' + QUOTENAME(c.name) +  '' '' 
    + QUOTENAME(t.name) + ''('' + CAST( case when T.NAME=''NVARCHAR'' THEN  c.max_length/2 
      WHEN  T.NAME=''NCHAR'' THEN  c.max_length/2 ELSE c.max_length  END  AS VARCHAR(10)) +'')''  
    + '' COLLATE SQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CI_AS'' + CASE WHEN c.is_nullable =1 THEN '' NULL '' 
     else '' NOT NULL ;'' END, ''-1'', ''MAX'' ), ''[text](16)'', ''[varchar](max)'') as cmd
    INTO #TblTMP
    from sys.columns c
    inner join sys.types t on t.user_type_id= c.user_type_id
    inner join sys.tables tb on  c.object_id=tb.object_id
    where c.collation_name is not null 
    and t.is_user_defined=0 and tb.is_ms_shipped=0 and tb.name<>''sysdiagrams''
    and c.collation_name<>''SQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CI_AS''
    order by tb.name, c.column_id
    
  declare @cmd varchar(max)
  declare c_cmd cursor for 
     select cmd from  #TblTMP
  open c_cmd
  fetch next from c_cmd into @cmd
  while (@@fetch_status=0)
  begin    
    exec( @cmd)
    fetch next from c_cmd into @cmd
  end
  close c_cmd
  deallocate c_cmd
  drop table #TblTMP
end'

It is worth noting that while running the script above some errors may arise because of some indexes might be using one of the columns we are trying to alter. So, in this likely event, it is recommendable to drop those indexes and then run the script again. That is all for the time being. Let me know any remarks you may have.

MSSQL_ENG003165: An error was encountered while replication was being restored/removed. The database has been left offline

While restoring a replicated database without KEEP_REPLICATION option, SQL Server will remove replication settings by executing sp_restoredbreplication at the end of the process. The 'sp_restoredbreplication' system stored procedure will delete all replication metadata, that is, deletion of 'tr_MStran_alterschemaonly', 'tr_MStran_altertable', 'tr_MStran_altertrigger' and 'tr_MStran_alterview' tiggers (which were created to validate alterations on the replication of tables, triggers, views), disable user tables for replication, and deletion of subscription/publications/articles. Nevertheless, there might be some cases where 'sp_restoredbreplication' cannot be executed successfully and ends up leaving the database OFFLINE. I personally experienced that case and the error was something like this:

Msg 3165, Level 16, State 1, Line 1
Database ‘MyDB’ was restored, however an error was encountered while replication was being restored/removed. The database has been left offline. See the topic MSSQL_ENG003165 in SQL Server Books Online.
Msg 3167, Level 16, State 1, Line 1
RESTORE could not start database ‘MyDB’.
Msg 3013, Level 16, State 1, Line 1
RESTORE DATABASE is terminating abnormally.

Looking into this case, I could see that the cause was a DDL database trigger which existed inside the database. Let me expand on what I am saying. The database had that trigger to audit some schema changes which were supposed to save into an auditing table. Unfortunately, that auditing table did not exist in the server where the database was being restored, and the deletion of objects of replication settings were not completed, which means that 'sp_restoredbreplication' was not executed correctly. Consequently, the restoration was stopped and SQL Server decided to leave the database OFFLINE.

In order to restore a copy of this database, we need to disable all DDL database triggers before taking its backup. Only then will the database be restored successfully. The other method to deal with this issue is to change the status to ONLINE manually after the restoration finishes unsuccessfully and also execute 'sp_restoredbreplication'.

To sum up, we need to proceed with more cautiousness while working with databases linked to replication. That is all for now. Let me know any remarks you may have. Thanks for reading. Stay tuned.